An exit clause has to settle four things while the partners still like each other: what event forces a sale, who must buy, at what price, and on what terms. Everything else in it is detail. Leave those four out and a statute fills the gap, and for most small businesses the statute's answer is worse than anything two reasonable people would have written.
How much worse depends on the form of the business. In a general partnership governed by the Uniform Partnership Act (1997), the version most states have adopted, a departing partner is owed the greater of liquidation value or going-concern value, in cash, within 120 days of a written demand (§701). Few small firms keep that much cash. In an LLC under the uniform LLC act, the departing member gets nothing on leaving: the interest stays theirs, but only as a transferee with a right to whatever distributions the others choose to make (Iowa Code §489.603 is a typical enactment). One default bankrupts the business; the other traps the partner.
What follows is each part of the clause, why it fails when it is vague, and sample wording to take to a lawyer. It is general information, not advice for any state; a lawyer where the business is formed should read the actual agreement.
What the law does if the agreement is silent
The default rules are worth reading once, because a badly drafted clause falls back on them. Most states follow the uniform acts, with their own section numbers; check the state tables for which act yours adopted.
Default exit rules with no agreement
| General partnership (UPA 1997) | LLC (uniform LLC act) | |
|---|---|---|
| Can a partner leave at any time? | Yes. The power to dissociate cannot be taken away (§602(a), §103(b)(6)) | Yes, by notice of express will (§602(1)) |
| Does leaving end the business? | In a partnership at will, yes: it dissolves and winds up (§801(1)) | No |
| Is the leaver bought out? | Yes, at the greater of liquidation or going-concern value, plus interest (§701(b)) | No. The leaver keeps the interest as a transferee (§603) |
| When is the money due? | The partnership must pay its estimate within 120 days of a written demand (§701(e)) | Only when distributions are made |
| What a death does | The partner is dissociated (§601(7)); the estate is owed the buyout price | The estate holds the interest as a transferee |
Neither default fits a business two people intend to keep running. A clause replaces both with a purchase the business can actually afford.
The events that should trigger a buyout
Each trigger needs a definition, not a label. "Disability" is the one most often left undefined, and it is the one most likely to end in court, because the partner who is ill and the partner doing the work see it differently. Tie it to a number of days or to the definition in a disability policy the partners actually hold. The usual list: voluntary withdrawal, retirement, death, disability, a transfer under a divorce decree, personal bankruptcy, expulsion for cause, loss of a license the business needs, and deadlock.
Triggering Events. Each of the following is a Triggering Event with respect to a Partner (the "Departing Partner"): (a) the Departing Partner's written notice of withdrawal under Section [__]; (b) the Departing Partner's death; (c) the Departing Partner's Disability; (d) a transfer or award of any part of the Departing Partner's interest under a decree of divorce or separation, unless the Departing Partner reacquires it within [90] days; (e) the Departing Partner's filing of a petition in bankruptcy or an assignment for the benefit of creditors; (f) the Departing Partner's expulsion for Cause under Section [__]; and (g) the loss or suspension for more than [60] days of any professional license the Departing Partner must hold to perform services for the Partnership. "Disability" means the Departing Partner's inability, because of a physical or mental condition, to perform substantially all of the Departing Partner's usual duties for the Partnership for [180] consecutive days or for [240] days in any [12] month period, as determined by a physician selected by the Partnership and reasonably acceptable to the Departing Partner or the Departing Partner's representative.
Fill the day counts with what the business could survive. A disability buyout insurance policy has its own elimination period; match the definition to it or the policy will not pay when the clause fires. Add "Cause" as a defined term (fraud, a felony, a material breach not cured within 30 days of notice).
Who must buy, and whether it is an obligation or an option
Each trigger should say whether the remaining partners (or the business) shall buy or may buy. A "may" protects the business from a purchase it cannot fund; a "shall" protects the departing partner, or an estate, from being stuck. A common split: "shall" on death and disability, where insurance can pay; "may" on voluntary withdrawal, with the option lapsing to a sale of the whole business if nobody buys.
The statute sets one limit. Under UPA (1997) §103(b)(6) an agreement cannot stop a partner from leaving; it can only require the notice to be in writing. What the agreement can do is make leaving early wrongful (§602(b)), which makes the leaver liable for the damage and, in a partnership for a term, lets the business defer the buyout until the term ends (§701(h)). That is the lever, and a notice period is how it is pulled.
Withdrawal. A Partner may withdraw only by written notice to the other Partners given at least [180] days before the withdrawal date stated in the notice. A withdrawal on shorter notice is a breach of this Agreement. Purchase. Within [60] days after a Triggering Event, the Partnership [shall / may] purchase, and the Departing Partner or the Departing Partner's estate shall sell, all of the Departing Partner's interest at the Purchase Price and on the Payment Terms set out below. If the Partnership does not elect to purchase within that period, the remaining Partners may purchase the interest pro rata to their percentage interests, and if they do not, [the Partnership shall be wound up and its business sold] [the Departing Partner shall hold the interest with all rights of a Partner other than management rights].
Choose a company purchase (redemption) or a purchase by the other partners (cross-purchase) with the tax and insurance consequences in mind; see the Connelly section below. The fallback in the last sentence decides what happens if nobody can afford to buy, which is exactly the case a clause is written for.
Setting the price so that two accountants reach the same number
Most buyout fights are about the method, not the figure, because a vague method lets each side's adviser produce the number their client needs. Three methods are in common use, and each fails in a known way.
Valuation methods for an exit clause
| Agreed value | Formula | Independent appraisal | |
|---|---|---|---|
| How it works | Partners sign a value each year | A stated multiple of a stated earnings figure, or book value | One or more credentialed appraisers value the interest |
| Cost | Nothing | Nothing beyond the accounts | An appraiser's fee each time it is used |
| How it fails | Nobody updates it, and a five-year-old number is used | The multiple no longer fits the business; book value ignores goodwill | The standard of value and the treatment of discounts are left open |
| Fix | Fall back to appraisal if the value is more than 12 to 18 months old | Define the earnings figure line by line and review the multiple each year | Name the standard (fair market value or fair value), the valuation date and whether minority or marketability discounts apply |
The discount question is the one that moves the most money. A 40% interest valued as a share of the whole business is worth more than the same interest valued as a minority stake nobody outside the firm would buy. Neither answer is wrong; leaving it unanswered is. The other common gap is the valuation date: the day of the trigger, the end of the last fiscal year, or the day the appraisal is delivered.
The strongest objection to an appraisal clause is cost and delay: two appraisals and a possible third cost real money and take months. That is real. It is also small next to litigation over a formula nobody can apply, and an agreed value that is current makes the appraisal unnecessary in most years. The two methods work best together.
Purchase Price. The Purchase Price is the Departing Partner's Percentage Interest multiplied by the Agreed Value most recently signed by all Partners under Section [__], if it was signed within [15] months before the Triggering Event. Otherwise the Purchase Price is the fair market value of the Departing Partner's interest as of the last day of the month before the Triggering Event (the "Valuation Date"), determined as follows. The Partnership and the Departing Partner shall each appoint, within [30] days, an appraiser holding the ASA, ABV or CVA credential. If the two appraisals differ by no more than [10]% of the higher, the Purchase Price is their average. Otherwise the two appraisers shall appoint a third, whose appraisal is final, and the Purchase Price is the average of the third appraisal and whichever of the first two is closer to it. [No discount for lack of control or lack of marketability shall be applied.] Each side pays its own appraiser; the Partnership and the Departing Partner share the third equally.
The bracketed sentence is a choice, not boilerplate: delete it if the partners want the price to reflect a minority stake. A clause that averages in the third appraisal discourages each side's appraiser from aiming high or low, since an outlier gets dropped.
Payment terms the business can actually meet
A fair price that has to be paid in cash next month can sink the business it values. Payment terms should be written so the remaining partners can pay out of normal cash flow: a down payment, a promissory note over several years, interest, security and an acceleration trigger if the business is sold.
Interest is not only a commercial term. For tax purposes, seller financing that charges less than the IRS's applicable federal rate has interest imputed under 26 U.S.C. §1274 (and §483 for smaller deals), so pegging the note to the AFR, or a stated margin above it, keeps the paperwork and the tax return in agreement.
Payment Terms. The purchaser shall pay [20]% of the Purchase Price within [60] days after it is determined, and the balance by a promissory note payable in [60] equal monthly installments of principal and interest, bearing interest at [the mid-term applicable federal rate for the month of closing plus 2 percentage points]. The note shall be secured by [a pledge of the purchased interest] and may be prepaid without penalty. The entire unpaid balance becomes due on a sale of all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets or of a majority of the interests in the Partnership. Total annual payments under this Section to all Departing Partners shall not exceed [__]% of the Partnership's net cash flow for the prior year; any excess is deferred, with interest.
The cash flow cap in the last sentence protects the business if two partners leave close together. The departing partner will push for a shorter note and stronger security; the remaining partners for a longer note. Settle it now, when nobody knows which side they will be on.
A 40% partner leaves a $1.2 million business
Hypothetical: the appraised value of the whole business is $1,200,000 and the departing partner holds 40%, with no discount applied. The clause above calls for 20% down and a 60-month note at an assumed 7%.
| Purchase price (40% of $1,200,000) | $480,000 |
|---|---|
| Down payment (20%) | $96,000 |
| Balance financed by the note | $384,000 |
| Monthly payment, 60 months at 7% | $7,603.66 |
| Total paid on the note | $456,219.61 |
| Interest over the term | $72,219.61 |
| Total cost to the buyers | $552,219.61 |
The remaining partners need $96,000 at closing and about $91,000 a year for five years. If the business clears less than that after paying the people still working in it, the clause needs a longer term, a lower down payment or insurance, not optimism.
The buyout calculator runs the same arithmetic on your own figures, and How to Buy Out a Business Partner covers carrying the purchase out once a trigger fires.
Paying for a death buyout, and what Connelly changed
Death is the one trigger insurance can fund in full, which is why so many buy-sell clauses require life insurance on each owner. The question is who owns the policies. In a redemption the business owns a policy on each owner and buys the interest itself. In a cross-purchase each owner owns a policy on the others and buys personally.
The case concerned a corporation, and how far it reaches into partnerships and LLCs is being worked out by estate planners rather than settled by a court. The practical reading is the same either way: an exit clause that relies on entity-owned insurance should be reviewed by someone who does estate tax, and a cross-purchase structure, or an insurance partnership that holds the policies, is the usual fix. With more than two or three owners a cross-purchase needs many policies (each owner insures every other), which is the trade-off.
Breaking a 50/50 deadlock with a shotgun clause
Two equal owners who cannot agree have no majority to break the tie, and without a clause the end is a court petition: under UPA (1997) §801(5) a court can order a partnership wound up when it is not reasonably practicable to carry on, and LLC acts have the same ground. A shotgun clause, also called a buy-sell offer or Russian roulette, gets there faster. One owner names a price for the whole business; the other must either sell at that price or buy at it. Because the owner naming the price does not know which side of the deal they will end up on, the price tends to be fair.
Its known weakness is money. If one partner could raise the purchase price and the other could not, the richer one can name a low price knowing the other cannot buy. Say so before signing, and consider a longer financing window for the buyer.
Deadlock Offer. If the Partners have voted on the same matter requiring their approval at two meetings held at least [30] days apart without a decision, and a mediation under Section [__] has not resolved it within [45] days after it began, either Partner (the "Offeror") may deliver a written offer stating a single price for 100% of the interests in the Partnership. Within [60] days after delivery the other Partner (the "Offeree") shall elect in writing either to sell the Offeree's entire interest to the Offeror, or to buy the Offeror's entire interest, in each case at the Offeree's or Offeror's Percentage Interest of the stated price. If the Offeree makes no election, the Offeree is deemed to have elected to sell. The purchase shall close within [120] days after the election, on the Payment Terms in Section [__].
The mediation step keeps the clause from being used as an opening move in an ordinary disagreement. See mediation vs arbitration for the dispute clause it points to. Give the buyer enough days to arrange financing, or the clause rewards whoever already has cash.
What sits next to the exit clause
Three clauses beside it decide whether the exit works in practice. A non-compete and non-solicit stops the departing partner taking the clients the purchase price just paid for; its enforceability is state law, covered in non-compete rules after a partnership ends. A dispute clause sends disagreements about the price to mediation or an appraiser rather than a courtroom. A transfer restriction with a right of first refusal stops an owner selling to an outsider before the others can buy. If the partners would rather end the business than buy each other out, the steps are in how to dissolve a partnership.
The agreement checklist lists the rest of the agreement clause by clause. The exit clause is the part partners are most tempted to skip, because negotiating it means imagining the partnership failing. That is precisely why it has to be written first: it is the only clause whose terms both partners can judge without knowing which of them it will be used against.
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Leave a Comment